User talk:Ngoogs

Speedy deletion of Nathaniel gugliotta

A tag has been placed on Nathaniel gugliotta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Evan Seeds (talk)(contrib.) 01:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy tags

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Nathaniel gugliotta. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Onorem♠Dil 15:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St. Paul Greek Orthodox Church

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article St. Paul Greek Orthodox Church, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that, like many congregations, this church would deserve an article. The problem with the one you wrote is that it gave no real indication of why it would be notable to anyone who is not part of the church (in which case they'd hardly need to come to an encyclopedia to learn about it). You might take a look at St. Demetrios Greek Orthodox Church (Seattle) (which I wrote) for an example of how to go about this and produce an article that would be kept. - Jmabel | Talk 03:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

I'd strongly suggest that you not refer to another user as a "douchebag", or make any other remarks with a similar tone. Incivility like that is a quick way to get banned from Wikipedia. This is a formal warning from me in my capacity as an administrator. - Jmabel | Talk 03:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: User talk:Jmabel. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rgoodermote 00:41, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More precisely, which he did here. Would someone please block this person? - Jmabel | Talk 01:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User Talk:Ngoogs, you will be blocked from editing. [1] Rgoodermote 01:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As you don't seem prepared to play nice with others, your account has been blocked indefinitely. Neıl ☎ 01:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]